Drug abuse Essay

The policy in Switzerland seems to be a success because in the blend 10 years thither has been an astounding reduction in impudent users, 82% in fact. Addicts are offered heroin on prescription, access to wound galleries, needle exchanges and oral methadone. This medicalised medicate use has removes its glamour, making it trivial and slight appealing. The British government however latch ons the view that allowing medicine consumption populate risks increasing levels of dealing and anti-social crime. This is the disadvantage currently obstructing the government following suit.The ready thinks that some users have turned round their lives as a final import of this treatment. They come off heroin because of the boredom of routine and drudgery. In asset to the professional opinion, a to a greater extent personal outlook given by a former addict stated that it should be done in very controlled conditions and only used as a last resort. As I saw on the video, drug abuse has b een a difficulty for centuries and I personally do not see a short letter where the world will be free of drug abuse.This is because, when the word drug is defined we mean a medication and there are umpteen legal drugs that are medically prescribed for the treatment of the ill. Drugs such as morphine and paracetamol can to a fault be misused, and the abuse can turn tail to deaths. In this sense the problem of drug abuse can neer be on the whole eliminated because people will just find some other drug to abuse. However, one must be cautious when reading the newspapers as it is likely to be biased. Not everything must be taken into cipher as it is not likely to be authentic or reliable.To a certain extent not all drugs are as liberal as each other some drugs bring about more harm than others. In other ways, if particular drugs are abused ceaselessly and in heavy quantities they can cause severe consequences, such as tobacco for example. Particular notice needs to be taken o f endangerment Ratings and the seriousness of heroin addiction. More should be done to prevent this, by tightening rules and regulations and giving harsher punishments to put off new users and give assistant to existing addicts.Both sources offer contrasting methods for dealing with the problem. The first method, life history upon the government to update the system whitethorn not be taken into consideration by some politicians as they do not need to lose votes. However, if it is considered and action is taken, it is a worthwhile action. The second method label upon softer laws can be seen as helping in some ways, notwithstanding mainly making it easier for drugs to be abused.In my opinion, the government should tighten rules and regulations for drug abuse and crackdown on Drug related crime, reducing the usage of drugs, and also supply help for the addicts to stabilise their lives. Politics and the law are barriers to some(prenominal) approaches because each method has to ga in the Governments approval prior to the action taken, this may prove difficult. This is due to the fact that political parties view their own positions in government more precious than the welfare of the public.As a result of this, they are more concerned with losing votes rather than losing lives. As a whole, drug abuse and addiction is a problem that cannot ever be eradicated completely but it can be controlled and reduced, particularly with certain drugs. As mentioned previously, there are options available to control the issue, and measures can be put in place to reduce drug abuse. The best method would be to take a combination of both options as stated previously. Maybe, in the removed(p) future, drug abuse may not be such a huge pandemic as it is today.